Re: A Formal Complaint:- Mr SHABPAR, Vehicle Reg., KH04VUL (TF60389586, 13/12/2013, 14:42)
We write
with regards to the matter above. We would like, if we may, to refer to all our
communications and correspondence to date, in particular, we must refer you to
the 5th Paragraph of our letter dated 20/05/2013. We are, as we have
already informed you, writing to challenge Transport for London in
issuing the notice; for variety of reasons.
First and foremost, if the intention of the Mayor of London, i.e., Mr Boris
Johnson, as we would like to believe, is to reduce congestion in Central
London and help the climate of the Globe, why motorists who have enter the
zone, i.e., for whatever reason, could not be prompted to pay the amount set
and levied through the usual channels, easily achievable, given
the state of technology available today, in particular to the Mayer of London and
the organisations which are supposed to be accountable to him and the people.
Why on earth, we would like to know, so The UK residence and the people of the
Globe, why there is a need for the Mayer to employ an army of people at the
expense of the tax payers under the umbrella of ‘Congestion Charging’ to issue
fines to motorists because of failing to pay the charge, probably for some good
reasons, causing them aggravation, inconveniences, and wasting their time and
efforts in dealing with you? Would it not be more constructive and helpful, if
your organisation were to employ carrots rather and stick, when dealing with
the motorists? After all you owe your job and livelihood to the very motorists
who use the congestion zone. Is this not so?
Second, at the space and the time that it is alleged it was our vehicle entered
the so called ‘congestion zone’, given the evidence, i.e., the photo provided
by your organisation on PCN, would not do; for many good reasons.
Third, you may also be interested to know that on 13/12/2013 we had to pay a visit
to the House of Parliament, for good reasons. Naturally we made a prior
arrangement with Met Police. If need be, you can verify it with them or
perhaps verify it on Google.
Fourth, the PCN that you have sent us, i.e., this ‘legal document’, that being
utilised by your organisation on behalf of the Mayor of London in order to fine
motorists can be scrutinised, criticized, and challenged from the beginning to the
end, on all its sections and paragraphs, at least by our organisation. As far
as we are concerned, the primary aim and purpose of this so-called ‘legal
document’ is to tax motorists as if they were not paying enough to Her
Majesty’s Government for utilising their vehicle: - Road Tax, Duties on Petrol,
MOT, etc. The Mayer of London ought to know.
Fifth, we would like, if we may, to know, so do the motorists who have and being
fined by you, how comes Transport for London and Congestion Charging are VAT
Registered? In other words you fine motorists, adding also 20% VAT to PCNs. What
a scandal!
We are,
as we set out in the first paragraph, writing to ask you for refund of £60,
paid, all in good faith, on our behalf by Ms S. Mehrjou in a letter sent
recorded, dated 11/05/2013 and costing us £1.70, in our absence from the UK.
For, you perhaps could not help but kept blackmailing us to pay or otherwise…
Please note that it is our expectation form your organisation, acting on behalf
of the Mayer of London that the amount of the refund would reflect not only the
costs and charges we have incurred to date, but also the interest and rate of
inflation, based on ‘official figures’, as broadcast by the Bank of England and
Chancellor of the Exchequer from time to time.
Yours
truly,
Mr. SHABPAR, Majid, The Director,
For & On Behalf Of IETCAD Co. Limited,
London, November 12, 2013
No comments:
Post a Comment